Mortgage Payoff vs. Investing

Last updated October 2026

Quick answer

Paying down a mortgage earns a guaranteed return equal to your interest rate. Investing might earn more, but might not. On a $400,000 loan at 6.25%, the two strategies break even at a market return of about 6.20% — essentially your mortgage rate. Below that, paying down wins. Above it, investing wins. Everything else in this decision is about risk, liquidity and tax, not arithmetic.

The comparison most articles get wrong

The usual framing is "6.25% mortgage vs. the stock market's 10% historical return — obviously invest." Two things are wrong with it.

First, you are not comparing 6.25% to 10%. You are comparing a certain 6.25% to an uncertain average that includes years of −37%. Those are different products, and a risk-free return should not be compared to a risky one at face value.

Second, and more subtly: most comparisons forget the freed-up payment. If you pay the mortgage off six years early, you then have the entire payment — $2,662.87 a month — available to invest for those six years. Ignoring that makes the payoff strategy look far worse than it is.

So here is the comparison done properly.

The setup

Same person, same $400,000 mortgage at 6.25% over 30 years, same $200 a month of spare money. Two choices, both measured at the end of year 30.

Strategy A — pay down firstStrategy B — invest throughout
Years 1 to payoff$200/mo extra to the mortgage$200/mo into the market
Loan is goneAfter 294 payments (24 yrs 6 mos)After 360 payments (30 yrs)
Remaining yearsInvest the full freed-up $2,662.87/mo for 66 monthsKeep investing $200/mo
At year 30House owned outright + portfolioHouse owned outright + portfolio

Both end with the house free and clear. The only question is which portfolio is bigger.

The result, at different market returns

Market returnA: pay down, then investB: invest throughoutDifferenceWinner
3%$190,822$116,547$74,274A
4%$196,217$138,810$57,407A
5%$201,811$166,452$35,359A
6%$207,611$200,903$6,708A
6.20%break-even — the two are identical—
7%$213,625$243,994$30,369B
8%$219,863$298,072$78,209B
10%$233,046$452,098$219,051B

The break-even is your mortgage rate

This is not a coincidence — it is the whole answer. Paying down debt at 6.25% is an investment returning 6.25%. If your investments beat your mortgage rate you come out ahead by investing; if they do not, you come out ahead by paying down. Every other consideration is a tiebreaker.

Which means the real question is narrower

Not "which is better," but: how confident are you of beating 6.25%, after tax, over your actual time horizon?

The case for investing

  • Diversified equities have historically returned more than 6.25% over long periods.
  • Tax-advantaged accounts improve the odds further — and 401(k)/IRA contribution room does not roll over, so an unused year is gone permanently.
  • An employer match is an instant 50–100%. Nothing competes with that; capture it before considering anything else here.
  • Investments stay liquid. Mortgage principal does not.
  • Inflation quietly erodes a fixed-rate debt in your favour while you hold it.

The case for paying down

  • The return is guaranteed. There is no sequence-of-returns risk, no bad decade, no panic-selling in a drawdown.
  • The saving is not taxed. Interest you never pay is not income, so a 6.25% mortgage saving is equivalent to a higher pre-tax investment return in a taxable account.
  • It reduces your required monthly cost of living, which shrinks the retirement savings you need.
  • No fees, no expense ratios, no platform, no decisions.
  • The psychological value of owing nothing is real and consistently underrated by spreadsheets.

The tax adjustment cuts both ways

Two adjustments are needed before comparing 6.25% to a market return honestly.

Your mortgage rate may be lower after tax. If you itemize, mortgage interest is deductible — at a 24% marginal rate, a 6.25% mortgage effectively costs about 4.75%, which lowers the hurdle investing has to clear. But around 90% of US filers take the standard deduction and get no marginal benefit at all. Check before assuming this applies to you.

Your investment return may be lower after tax too. In a taxable brokerage account, dividends and capital gains are taxed. A 7% nominal return might be nearer 6% after tax — which erases most of investing's apparent edge at these rates. In a Roth or traditional 401(k), it is not, which is much of why tax-advantaged space matters so much here.

Compare like with like

A 6.25% guaranteed, tax-free saving against a 7% pre-tax, at-risk return in a taxable account is not the clear win it looks like. Against 7% inside a Roth IRA, it is a genuinely different comparison.

What the table cannot show you

Three things that matter as much as the arithmetic:

Sequence risk

The table assumes a smooth annual return. Real markets do not deliver that. Two portfolios with the same 30-year average can end very differently depending on when the bad years arrive. The payoff strategy has no equivalent risk — 6.25% saved is 6.25% saved, every month.

Behaviour

The investing strategy only wins if you actually keep investing through a 35% drawdown. Many people do not. An automatic extra mortgage payment requires no conviction during a crash. If you know you would sell at the bottom, the guaranteed option may genuinely suit you better than its expected return suggests.

Liquidity

This one favours investing clearly. A brokerage account can be sold in a day. Mortgage principal cannot be withdrawn at all — you must sell the house or borrow it back, and a lender is least likely to lend precisely when you most need it. This is why an emergency fund must come before either strategy.

The order that resolves most of it

Before the payoff-versus-investing question is even live, three things outrank both:

  1. 3–6 months of expenses in cash. Neither strategy helps in a job loss.
  2. Any debt above roughly 8%. Paying off 22% credit card debt beats both by a wide margin.
  3. Your full employer match. An instant 50% return is not something either option can approach.

A surprising share of "should I pay off my mortgage or invest" questions are answered entirely by this list.

The middle path is usually the sensible one

The break-even table shows the two extremes, but the choice is not binary. Splitting $400 a month between extra principal and investments captures a guaranteed return on half and market exposure on the other half, and hedges the possibility that you are wrong about which side of 6.20% the next 30 years land on.

Given that nobody knows the future return of the market and everybody knows their mortgage rate exactly, hedging is a defensible answer rather than an indecisive one.

Run your own numbers

Track your actual mortgage

The figures on this page are an example loan. MortMetrix builds your full amortization schedule from your real balance, rate and term, then shows exactly what any extra payment does to your payoff date, lifetime interest and equity.

Create a free account

Free to use. No bank login required — your numbers stay yours.

Frequently asked questions

Is it better to pay off your mortgage or invest?

It depends on whether your investments beat your mortgage rate. On a 6.25% loan the two break even at a market return of about 6.20% — below that, paying down wins; above it, investing wins. Because a mortgage payoff is guaranteed and market returns are not, many people reasonably choose the certain option even when the expected value favours investing.

What return do I need to beat paying off my mortgage?

Your mortgage rate, after tax. That is the whole rule. At 6.25% you need to reliably beat about 6.25% — or roughly 4.75% if you itemize and are in the 24% bracket. In a taxable account you need a higher pre-tax return to clear the same bar.

Should I pay off my mortgage before retiring?

Entering retirement without a $2,463 monthly payment reduces the income your savings must produce, which is a genuine advantage. Whether prepaying or investing gets you there more reliably depends on your rate and years remaining — and on how much you value a guaranteed outcome as your horizon shortens.

Does the mortgage interest deduction change the answer?

Only if you itemize. Around 90% of US filers take the standard deduction and get no marginal benefit, so their effective rate is their actual rate. For an itemizer at 24%, a 6.25% mortgage costs nearer 4.75%, which lowers the hurdle investing must clear.

Can I do both?

Yes, and most people probably should. Splitting spare money between extra principal and investments captures a guaranteed return on part of it and market exposure on the rest — a reasonable hedge given that nobody knows future returns and everybody knows their mortgage rate.

Related guides

Figures on this page are generated from the same amortization engine that powers the MortMetrix dashboard, using the example loan stated in each table. They are estimates based on a fixed-rate loan at a constant rate and are not your actual loan terms. This is educational information, not financial advice.